Obstacles to timely neonatal screening in North Thames

Citation
Ae. Ades et al., Obstacles to timely neonatal screening in North Thames, J MED SCREE, 5(4), 1998, pp. 183-186
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health
Journal title
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING
ISSN journal
09691413 → ACNP
Volume
5
Issue
4
Year of publication
1998
Pages
183 - 186
Database
ISI
SICI code
0969-1413(1998)5:4<183:OTTNSI>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
Objective-To assess the timeliness of neonatal (Guthrie card) screening in North Thames, and to identify the most effective ways of improving it. Design-Analysis of information routinely collected in the course of neonata l screening; reanalysis of published data on blood phenylalanine concentrat ion in phenylketonuria (PKU) over the first two weeks; simulation studies o n the impact of different interventions. Subjects-100 690 infants born over one year and screened at Great Ormond St reet Hospital NHS Trust. Outcome measure-Interval between birth and reading PKU screen results. Results-Although 75% of samples (district range 55-91%) were collected by d ay 7, only 81% had arrived in the laboratory seven days later (range 57-96% ). The average interval between birth and reading results was 14.5 days, wi th only 9.7% read by day 10. Samples could be collected from day 4 without significant impact on false negative rates for PKU. If samples were collect ed from day 4 and posted promptly (second class), the average interval betw een birth and reading results could be reduced to 9.3 days. If first class mail were used and the laboratory operated on Saturdays, and used assays th at could be read the same day rather than bacterial inhibition assays, the average would be 7.8 days, with 96% read by day 10. Conclusion-Timeliness of neonatal screening shows unacceptable variation be tween districts, and delays in dispatch of specimens to the laboratory. Sam e day, first class posting should be introduced, and samples could be colle cted between days 4 and 8.