R. Fatum et M. Hutchison, Is intervention a signal of future monetary policy? Evidence from the federal funds futures market, J MONEY C B, 31(1), 1999, pp. 54-69
Sterilized foreign exchange market intervention may affect the exchange rat
e if it signals future monetary policy actions. Signaling will be effective
if the central bank backs up intervention with predictable changes in the
stance of monetary policy and, in turn, affects current expectations. We in
vestigate whether intervention operations in the United States are related
to changes in expectations over the stance of future monetary policy, where
expectations are proxied by federal funds futures rates. This relatively n
ew futures market instrument has proved to be an efficient and unbiased pre
dictor of the future spot federal funds rate. Estimates obtained from a GAR
CH time-series model over the 1989-93 period using daily data do not suppor
t the signaling hypothesis: dollar-support intervention is not related to a
rise in expected future short-term interest rates (monetary tightening). H
owever, intervention appears to significantly increase the conditional vari
ance of federal funds futures rates, suggesting that it adds considerable n
oise to the marker and possibly increasing the degree of uncertainty over t
he future course of monetary policy.