F. Vicini et al., Irradiation of the tumor bed alone after lumpectomy in selected patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conserving therapy, J SURG ONC, 70(1), 1999, pp. 33-40
Backgrounds and Objectives: We present the interim findings of our in-house
protocol treating the tumor bed alone after lumpectomy with low-dose-rate
(LDR) interstitial brachytherapy in selected patients with early-stage brea
st cancer treated with breast conserving therapy (BCT).
Methods: From 1 March 1993 through 1 January 1995, 50 women with early-stag
e breast cancer were entered into a protocol of tumor bed irradiation alone
using an interstitial LDR implant. Patients were eligible if their tumor w
as an infiltrating ductal carcinoma less than or equal to 3 cm in diameter,
surgical margins were clear by at least 2 mm, the tumor did not contain an
extensive intraductal component, the axilla was surgically staged with les
s than or equal to 3 nodes involved with cancer, and a postoperative mammog
ram was performed. Implants were positioned using a template guide deliveri
ng 50 Gy over 96 hr to the lumpectomy bed plus a 1-2-cm margin. Local contr
ol, cosmetic outcome, and complications were assessed.
Results: Patients ranged in age from 40 to 84 pears (median, 65). The media
n tumor size was 10 mm (range. 1-25). Seventeen of 50 patients (34%) had we
ll-differentiated tumors, 22 (44%) had moderately differentiated tumors, an
d in 11 (22%) the tumor was poorly differentiated. Forty-five patients (90%
) were node-negative while five (10%) had 1-3 positive nodes. A total of 23
(46%) patients were placed on tamoxifen and 3 (6%) received adjuvant syste
mic chemotherapy. No patient was lost to followup. The median follow-up for
surviving patients is 47 months (range, 37-59). No patient has experienced
a local, regional, or distant failure. Three patients have died at 19, 33,
and 39 months after treatment. All were without clinical evidence of recur
rent disease and all deaths were unrelated to treatment. Good-to-excellent
cosmetic results have been observed in 49 of 50 patients (98%) (median cosm
etic follow-up was 44 months with a range of 19-59). No patient has experie
nced significant sequelae related to their implant.
Conclusions: Interim results with treatment of the tumor bed alone with an
LDR interstitial implant appear promising. Long-term follow-up of these pat
ients and additional studies will be necessary to establish the equivalence
of this treatment approach compared to standard BCT. J. Surg. Oncol. 1999;
70:33-40. (C) 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.