A large chamber test method for measuring indoor air emissions from office
equipment was developed, evaluated, and revised based on the initial testin
g of four dry-process photocopiers. Because all chambers may not necessaril
y produce similar results (e.g., due to differences in sink effects, temper
ature and humidity control, air exchange, pollutant monitoring, and measure
ment biases), a preliminary four-laboratory evaluation of the revised test
method was conducted. To minimize variability, the evaluation used a single
dry-process photocopier that was shipped to each of the four laboratories
along with supplies (i.e., toner and paper).
The results of this preliminary four-laboratory evaluation demonstrate that
the test method was used successfully in the different chambers to measure
emissions from dry-process photocopiers. Differences in chamber design and
construction appeared to have had minimal effect on the results for the vo
latile organic compounds (VOCs). Perhaps more important than the chamber it
self is the sample analysis as identified by duplicate samples that were an
alyzed by a different laboratory. Percent relative standard deviation (%RSD
) was used to provide a simplistic view of interlaboratory precision for th
is evaluation. Excluding problems with suspected analytical bias observed f
rom one of the laboratories, the precision was excellent for the VOCs with
RSDs of less than 10% in most cases. Less precision was observed among the
laboratories for aldehydes/ketones (RSD of 23.2% for formaldehyde). The pre
cision for ozone emission rates among three of the laboratories was excelle
nt (RSD of 7.9%), but emission rates measured at the fourth laboratory were
much higher.