Ds. Woodruff-pak et al., Relationships among age, conditioned stimulus-unconditioned stimulus interval, and neuropsychological test performance, NEUROPSYCHL, 13(1), 1999, pp. 90-102
To evaluate the effect of age at various conditioned stimulus (CS)-uncondit
ioned stimulus (US) intervals, 144 young, middle-aged, and older adults wer
e tested on eyeblink classical conditioning at CS-US intervals of 500, 1,00
0, or 1,500 ms. Reaction time, response timing, motor learning, declarative
memory, and attention were assessed to identify correlates of conditioning
at various CS-US intervals. Previously reported middle-aged and older adul
ts were impaired at a 400-ms CS-US interval, but the addition of 100 ms to
the CS-US interval in this study enabled equal conditioning in middle-aged
and young adults. At a 1,000-ms CS-US interval, older adults remained signi
ficantly impaired. It was only at the 1,500-ms; CS-US interval that conditi
oning was equal for the 3 age groups. Measures of reaction time, timing, an
d motor learning were not correlated systematically with conditioning. Wher
eas the results of age differences at various CS-US intervals were clear an
d striking, patterns of relationships among neuropsychological and conditio
ning variables were not consistent in indicating sources of age differences
.