O. Kazennikov et al., Neural activity of supplementary and primary motor areas in monkeys and its relation to bimanual and unimanual movement sequences, NEUROSCIENC, 89(3), 1999, pp. 661-674
A chronic single-unit study of motor cortical activity was undertaken in tw
o monkeys trained to perform a bimanually coordinated task. The hypothesis
was tested that the supplementary motor area plays a specific role in coord
inating the two hands for common goal-oriented actions. With this objective
, a special search was made for neurons that might exhibit properties exclu
sively related to bimanual task performance. Monkeys learned to reach for a
nd to pull open a spring-loaded drawer with one hand, while the other hand
reached out to grasp food from the drawer recess. The two hands were precis
ely coordinated for achievement of this goal. Monkeys also performed, in se
parate blocks of trials, only the pulling or grasping movements, using the
same hands as in the bimanual task. Task-related activity of 348 neurons fr
om the supplementary motor area and 341 neurons from the primary motor area
, each examined in the bimanual and in both unimanual tasks, was recorded i
n the two hemispheres. Most neurons from the supplementary motor area were
recorded within its caudal microexcitable portion. Contrary to expectation,
the proportion of neurons with activity patterns related exclusively to th
e bimanual task was small, but somewhat higher in the supplementary motor a
rea (5%) than in the primary motor cortex (2%). Another group of neurons th
at were equally modulated during the bimanual as well as to both unimanual
task components might also contribute in controlling bimanual actions. Such
"task-dependent" rather than "effector-dependent" activity patterns were m
ore common in neurons of the supplementary motor area (19%) than of the pri
mary motor cortex (5%). Bilateral receptive fields were also more numerous
among the supplementary motor area neurons. However, a large majority of ne
urons from primary and supplementary motor areas had activity profiles clea
rly related only to contralateral hand movements (65% in the primary motor
and 51% in the supplementary motor area). A similar group of neurons showed
an additional slight modulation with ipsilateral movements; they were equa
lly common in the two areas (14% and 16%, respectively) and their significa
nce for bimanual coordination is questionable. Summed activity profiles of
all neurons recorded in the primary and supplementary motor areas of the sa
me hemisphere were compared. The modulations of the three histograms, corre
sponding to the two unimanual and the bimanual tasks, were similar for the
two motor areas, i.e. prominent with bimanual and contralateral movements a
nd weak with ipsilateral movements.
It is concluded that the supplementary motor area is likely to contribute t
o bimanual coordination, perhaps more than the primary motor cortex, but th
at it is not a defining function for the former cortical area. Instead, it
is suggested that the supplementary motor area is part of a callosally inte
rconnected and distributed network of frontal and parietal cortical areas t
hat together orchestrate bimanual coordination. (C) 1999 IBRO. Published by
Elsevier Science Ltd.