Variations in the amplitude of the atrial and ventricular depolarization wa
ves of the intracardiac electrogram occur during different phases of respir
ation. Therefore, we tested whether controlled ventilation would reduce abl
ation attempts and increase the rate of success in patients undergoing radi
ofrequency ablation with general anesthesia. Thirty-eight children were div
ided into two groups: II) controlled and (2) noncontrolled or cyclic ventil
ation. In the controlled ventilation group, the mapping electrogram was rec
orded during sustained inspiration, sustained expiration, and cyclic ventil
ation. Ablation was done in the phase of ventilation that had the least var
iability in atrial and ventricular amplitudes. Seventeen patients in the co
ntrolled ventilation group had tracings adequate for review. in eight patie
nts, ablation was done during sustained inspiration with the percentage cha
nge of atrial and ventricular amplitudes (15% +/- 16% and 13% +/- 16%, resp
ectively) being ( that during sustained expiration (38% +/- 27%, P = 0.04 a
nd 20% +/- 21%) or during cyclic ventilation (57% +/- 27%, P < 0.01 and 54%
+/- 26%, P = 0.003). In nine patients, ablation was done during sustained
expiration with the percentage change of atrial and ventricular amplitudes
(5% +/- 5% and 5% +/- 2%) being less than that during sustained inspiration
(21% +/- 14%, P = 0.01 and 11% +/- 6%, P = 0.01) or during cyclic ventilat
ion (68% +/- 23%, P < 0.001 and 48 +/- 26%, P = 0.001). We achieved success
with each patient in both groups, but the number of ablation attempts were
less in the controlled ventilation group 1 (3 +/- 2), as compared to the c
yclic ventilation group 2 (8 +/- 8; P < 0.02). We concluded that controlled
ventilation reduced the number of ablation attempts and facilitated the ab
lation procedure.