Differences in distribution and density between gorillas and chimpanzees ar
e reconsidered with special reference to population structure. Both ecologi
cal and social factors influencing population structure are compared betwee
n species and between habitats within species. Gorillas and chimpanzees res
pond differently to a decline in food quality, such as fruit scarcity: gori
llas change diet and decrease range, while chimpanzees do not change diet b
ut may expand range. These responses result in different effects on their g
rouping patterns. For gorillas the dispersed distribution and reduction of
range size decreases the rate of inter-unit encounters and female transfer.
The concentration of social units increases the rate of aggressive contact
between units and stimulates female transfer. Social units of gorillas may
crowd or disperse in order to attain the optimal density. This tendency ma
y result in similar densities of gorillas across habitats. By contrast, the
distribution patterns or range size may not affect inter-unit relationship
s of chimpanzees. Within a single unit-group, various reproductive strategi
es are adopted by both sexes. Independent travel of females and flexible gr
ouping patterns enable them to survive at very low density in extraordinary
large ranges. Density and inter-unit relationships are good criteria for a
healthy population of gorillas, while the size of unit-group and inter-ind
ividual relationships are good criteria for chimpanzees. Conservation plann
ers should consider these differences for sympatric and allopatric survival
in these species.