Ma. Peterson et al., Object-centered attentional biases and object recognition contributions toscene segmentation in left- and right-hemisphere-damaged patients, PSYCHOBIOLO, 26(4), 1998, pp. 357-370
Participants viewed elongated rectangular displays in which two regions sha
red a central contour. In experimental stimuli, the central contour portray
ed a known object on one, high-denotative, side. In control stimuli, no kno
wn objects were portrayed on either side of the central contour but one sid
e of each control stimulus was a scrambled version of one of the high-denot
ative regions, matching it on all factors known to influence scene segmenta
tion other than object recognition. For each display, participants decided
whether the left or the right region was more likely to be an object. Parad
oxically, both right-hemisphere- (RH) and left-hemisphere- (LH) damaged ind
ividuals were more likely to see objects lying on the contralesional rather
than the ipsilesional side of the central contour. This tendency is attrib
uted to an object-centered attentional bias toward the central contour when
objects lie on its contralesional side and away from the central contour w
hen objects Lie on its ipsilesional side. Object-centered attentional biase
s were stronger following RH than LH damage. Elderly control participants s
howed a slight bias in the same direction as RH-damaged individuals. More h
igh-denotative regions than scrambled regions were seen as objects, even wh
en object-centered attention was biased away from the central contour carry
ing the object recognition information. The latter result suggests that the
object recognition processes contributing to scene segmentation are preatt
entive.