Empirical evidence of paradoxes of voting in Dutch elections

Citation
Ama. Van Deemen et Np. Vergunst, Empirical evidence of paradoxes of voting in Dutch elections, PUBL CHOICE, 97(3), 1998, pp. 475-490
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Politucal Science & public Administration
Journal title
PUBLIC CHOICE
ISSN journal
00485829 → ACNP
Volume
97
Issue
3
Year of publication
1998
Pages
475 - 490
Database
ISI
SICI code
0048-5829(199812)97:3<475:EEOPOV>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
In this paper we analyze four national elections held in 1982, 1986, 1989 a nd 1994 in the Netherlands on the occurrence of the Condorcet paradox. In a ddition, we investigate these elections on the occurrence of three so-calle d majority-plurality paradoxes. The first paradox states that a party havin g a majority over another party may receive less seats. The second states t hat a Condorcet winner may not receive the largest number of seats and even may not receive a seat at all. The third says that the majority relation m ay be the reverse of the ranking of parties in terms of numbers of seats.