Abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy - A feasibility study for further evaluation in randomized trials

Citation
Cr. Nwosu et Jk. Gupta, Abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy - A feasibility study for further evaluation in randomized trials, SURG ENDOSC, 13(2), 1999, pp. 148-150
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
ISSN journal
09302794 → ACNP
Volume
13
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
148 - 150
Database
ISI
SICI code
0930-2794(199902)13:2<148:ALAVHW>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
Background: The abdominal route is the traditional method of performing hys terectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. In a feasibility study, we compared a nonconventional (vaginal) route for bilateral salpingo-oophorect omy at the time of vaginal hysterectomy (VH + BSO) to similar forms of hyst erectomy performed abdominally or with operative laparoscopy, Methods: Fifty-nine patients were subject to either total abdominal hystere ctomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (TAH + BSO; n = 19), or laparosco pic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (LAVH + BSO; n = 19) or VH + BSO (n = 21). Results: VH + BSO resulted in a shorter operating time compared to LAVH + B SO (p < 0.001), shorter hospital stay compared with TAH + BSO (p = 0.001), and quicker longterm recovery compared to the other two operations. Conclusion: This preliminary but significant study shows that the vaginal r oute for salpingo-oophorectomy at the time of vaginal hysterectomy is super ior to other methods of hysterectomy. A randomized trial is needed to confi rm these initial findings.