Measuring support for tobacco control policy in selected areas of six countries

Citation
Rg. Laforge et al., Measuring support for tobacco control policy in selected areas of six countries, TOB CONTROL, 7(3), 1998, pp. 241-246
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science","Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health
Journal title
TOBACCO CONTROL
ISSN journal
09644563 → ACNP
Volume
7
Issue
3
Year of publication
1998
Pages
241 - 246
Database
ISI
SICI code
0964-4563(199823)7:3<241:MSFTCP>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
Objective-To explore the validity, reliability, and applicability of using a short, psychometrically sound survey instrument to measure population att itudes toward tobacco control policies. Design-Surveys. Subjects and setting-Student respondents attending university in Australia (n = 403), Hong Kong (n = 336), the Netherlands (n = 351), South Africa (n = 291), the United Kingdom (n = 164) and the United States (n = 241); total n = 1786. Main outcome measure-The Smoking Policy Inventory (SPI), a 35-item scale. S PI scores were adjusted for age, income, gender, and smoking status. Estima tes of internal consistency and tests of factorial invariance were conducte d in each sample. Results-Across all six countries, the SPI was found to be highly reliable a nd to have a consistent factor structure, indicating that the SPI scale rep resents a higher order construct that assesses general attitudes about toba cco control policy with five dimensions. In general, the degree of endorsem ent of anti-tobacco policies as measured by the SPI reflected the extent an d strength of tobacco control legislation in those countries. Dutch student s were the least likely, and Australian and Hong Kong students the most Lik ely, to support tobacco control policies. Conclusions-It is possible to develop appropriate and meaningful measuremen t tools for assessing support of tobacco control policies. Strong evidence was found for internal reliability and structural invariance of the SM. The SPI may be a useful mechanism for monitoring ongoing policy initiatives, m aking cross-cultural comparisons, and evaluating population receptiveness t o proposed policy approaches.