Response modulation by texture surround in primate area V1: Correlates of "popout" under anesthesia

Citation
Hc. Nothdurft et al., Response modulation by texture surround in primate area V1: Correlates of "popout" under anesthesia, VIS NEUROSC, 16(1), 1999, pp. 15-34
Citations number
76
Categorie Soggetti
da verificare
Journal title
VISUAL NEUROSCIENCE
ISSN journal
09525238 → ACNP
Volume
16
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
15 - 34
Database
ISI
SICI code
0952-5238(199901/02)16:1<15:RMBTSI>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
We studied the effects of contextual modulation in area V1 of anesthetized macaque monkeys. In 146 cells, responses to a single line over the center o f the receptive field were compared with those to full texture patterns in which the center line was surrounded by similar lines at either the same or ientation (uniform texture) or the orthogonal orientation (orientation cont rast). On average, the responses to single lines were reduced by 42% when t exture was presented in the surround. Uniform textures often produced stron ger suppression (7% more, on average) so that lines with orientation contra st on average evoked larger responses than lines in uniform texture fields. This difference is correlated with perceptual differences between such sti muli, suggesting that physiological mechanisms contributing to the saliency ("popout") of textural stimuli operate, at least to some degree, even unde r anesthesia. Significant response modulation by the texture surround was s een in 112 cells (77%). Fifty-three cells (36%) responded differently to th e two texture patterns; response preferences for orientation contrast (35 c ells; 24%) were seen more often than preferences for uniform textures (18 c ells; 12%). The remaining 59 cells (40%) were similarly suppressed by both texture surrounds. Detailed analysis of texture modulation revealed two maj or components of surround effects: (1) fast nonspecific ("general") suppres sion that occurred at about the same latency as excitatory responses and wa s found in all layers of striate cortex; and (2) differential response modu lation that began about 60-70 ms after stimulus onset (about 15-20 ms after the onset of the excitatory response) and was less homogeneously distribut ed over cortical layers.