AGRAMMATIC AND NON-BRAIN-DAMAGED SUBJECTS VERB AND VERB ARGUMENT STRUCTURE PRODUCTION

This study examined verb and verb argument structure production in 10 agrammatic aphasic and 10 non-brain-damaged subjects. Production of si x types of verbs was examined in two conditions-a confrontation and an elicited condition; and production of verb arguments was examined in a sentence condition in which each target verb was elicited with all p ossible argument structure arrangements. Results showed statistically significant differences between the aphasic and non-brain-damaged subj ects in all conditions, but no significant differences were found betw een confrontation and elicited labelling conditions for either subject group. The aphasic subjects, however, produced obligatory one-place v erbs correctly significantly more often than three-place or complement verbs in the elicited condition and a consistent hierarchy of verb di fficulty was found in both the confrontation and elicited conditions, For both subject groups sentence production was influenced by the numb er of arguments or participant roles and by the type of arguments requ ired by the verb. In addition, the complexity of the verb (i.e. the nu mber of possible argument structure arrangements) influenced sentence production with simple verbs produced correctly with their arguments m ore often than complex ones. Finally, obligatory arguments were produc ed correctly more often than optional ones, even when production of th e optional arguments was requested. These data indicate that the argum ent structure properties of verbs are important dimensions of lexical organization that influence both verb retrieval and sentence productio n in agrammatic aphasic subjects.