The primary purpose of this investigation was to perform a VOT analysi
s of correct and incorrect productions elicited from an apraxic/aphasi
c speaker (S1), who consistently devoiced stop and affricate targets.
A secondary objective was to analyse the VOTs of an apraxic/aphasic sp
eaker (S2) who produced stop and affricate voicing distinctions correc
tly, as determined by broad phonetic transcription. Seven hundred and
ninety monosyllabic words, representing four voiced-voiceless cognate
pairs, were analysed for each subject. VOT results indicated that S1's
error productions (i.e. [t] for /d/; [p] for /b/; [k] for /g/; and [t
integral] for /d(3)/) differed significantly from his correct, voicel
ess, homonymous productions (i.e. [t] for /t/; [p] for /p/; [k] for /k
/; and [t integral] for /tf/). Therefore, Si's sound errors were not c
onsidered to be sound substitutions, as had been indicated perceptuall
y. Overlapping VOT values were found for all of S2's voiced-voiceless
cognate pairs, despite perceptually accurate productions, indicating p
ossible speech motor control problems.