Differences in spatial genetic population structure between African and Asian elephant (Loxodonta africana, Elephas maximus) as revealed by sequence analysis of the mitochondrial Cyt b gene
R. Tiedemann et al., Differences in spatial genetic population structure between African and Asian elephant (Loxodonta africana, Elephas maximus) as revealed by sequence analysis of the mitochondrial Cyt b gene, ACT THERIOL, 1998, pp. 123-134
To assess spatial genetic population structure of both extant elephant spec
ies, we investigated sequence variation in 369bp of the mitochondrial Cyt b
gene in 23 specimens of African elephant Loxodonta africana (Blumenbach, 1
797) from three regions in the Southern part of Africa. In an integrated an
alysis, these results were compared to data of a previous study, where the
same gene region had been analysed in 53 Asian elephants Elephas maximus (L
innaeus, 1758) from 5 different regions on Sri Lanka and Asian mainland. In
Loxodonta, 14 polymorphic sites defined 6 different mitochondrial haplotyp
es with a mean sequence divergence of 2.085%. In Elephas, 6 polymorphic sit
es defined 8 different haplotypes with a mean sequence divergence of 0.942%
. Compared to other mammals, genetic variation is high in Loxodonta and mod
erate in Elephas. The difference in genetic variation among the species cou
ld be explained either by a Pliocene bottleneck in Elephas or by different
long term effective population sizes. In Elephas, a star like phylogeny of
haplotypes was found, indicative of a population expansion after a bottlene
ck. In Loxodonta, very divergent mtDNA lineages coexisted, suggesting the a
bsence of any bottleneck in population history. Within regional subpopulati
ons, both species showed similar mean haplotype diversities, while mean nuc
leotide diversity within regions was higher in Loxodonta than in Elephas. T
his suggest larger long-term effective population sizes in Loxodonta, while
short-term effective population sizes are presumably similar in both speci
es. Spatial genetic population structure in Loxodonta is mainly determined
by isolation-by-distance, while in Elephas it is impacted by human transloc
ation. Human translocation might have prevented isolated small Elephas popu
lations from severe genetic depletion.