Long term consequences of gastrectomy for patients' quality of life: The impact of reconstructive techniques

Citation
J. Svedlund et al., Long term consequences of gastrectomy for patients' quality of life: The impact of reconstructive techniques, AM J GASTRO, 94(2), 1999, pp. 438-445
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Gastroenerology and Hepatology
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
ISSN journal
00029270 → ACNP
Volume
94
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
438 - 445
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9270(199902)94:2<438:LTCOGF>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
Objective: During recent years considerable interest has been focused on qu ality of life as an additional therapeutic outcome measure in the surgical treatment of gastric carcinoma. However, the long term consequences of gast rectomy and the impact on quality of life of different reconstructive techn iques are still a matter of controversy. To broaden the criteria for choice of treatment, we conducted a prospective randomized clinical trial to dete rmine the impact of various gastrectomy procedures on quality of life durin g a 5-yr follow-up period. Methods: Consecutive patients (n = 64) eligible for curative gastric cancer surgery were randomized to have either total (n = 31) or subtotal (n = 13) gastrectomy or a jejunal S-shaped pouch (n = 20 ) as a gastric substitute after total gastrectomy. Assessments of quality o f life were made on seven occasions during a 5-yr period: within 1 wk befor e surgery, 3 and 12 months after the surgical intervention, and then once/y r, All patients were interviewed by one of two psychiatrists, who rated the ir symptoms and introduced standardized self-report questionnaires covering both general and specific aspects of life. The raters were blinded for the patients' group affiliations. Results: Survival rates were similar in all treatment groups. Patients who had a total gastrectomy continued to suffer from alimentary symptoms, especially indigestion and diarrhea, during the e ntire follow-up period. However, patients who underwent subtotal gastrectom y had a significantly better outcome already during the first postoperative yr, Patients given a gastric substitute after gastrectomy improved with th e passage of time and had an even better outcome in the long run. Conclusio ns: To optimize the rehabilitation after gastrectomy, patients' quality of life must be taken into consideration. When subtotal gastrectomy is clinica lly feasible, this procedure has advantages in the early postoperative peri od. However, a pouch reconstruction after total gastrectomy should be consi dered in patients having a favorable tumor status suggesting a fair chance of long term survival. (Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:438-445. (C) 1999 by Am, Cell. of Gastroenterology).