M. Mathur et al., TRFK-5 reverses established airway eosinophilia but not established hyperresponsiveness in a murine model of chronic asthma, AM J R CRIT, 159(2), 1999, pp. 580-587
We studied the effects of an anti-interleukin (IL)-5 monoclonal antibody (T
RFK-5) or dexamethasone (DEX) to reverse already established airway hyperre
sponsiveness (AHR) and tissue eosinophilia in a Schistosoma mansoni antigen
-sensitized and airway-challenged mouse model of chronic asthma. In this mo
del at 4 d after antigen challenge there is dramatic bronchoalveolar lavage
fluid (BAL) eosinophilia, AHR to intravenous methacholine (MCh), and histo
logic evidence of peribronchial eosinophilic infiltration and mucoid cell h
yperplasia. These changes persist for up to 2 wk after antigen challenge. T
reatment with DEX from Days 4 through 10 significantly reduced established
airway eosinophilia compared with animals sham-treated with saline from Day
s 4-10 (120 +/- 29 eosinophils/mu l BAL for DM-treated mice versus 382 +/-:
60 eosinophils/mu l BAL for sham-treated animals, p < 0.01). DEX-treated m
ice also had dramatically reduced mucoid cell hyperplasia, and airway respo
nsiveness returned to normal, in contrast, TRFK-5 given during the same tim
e period reduced airway eosinophilia (86 +/- 32 eosinophils/mu l BAL versus
382 +/- 60 eosinophils/mu l BAL, p < 0.01) but did not reduce goblet cell
hyperplasia or reverse already established AHR. Treatment with DEX but not
TRFK-5 also inhibited interferon gamma (IFN-gamma) content of BAL fluid (0.
49 +/- 0.09 ng/ml BAL fluid for DEX versus 1.50 +/- 0.24 ng/ml BAL fluid an
d 1.36 +/- 0.13 ng/ml BAL fluid for TRFK-5 and sham-treated mice, respectiv
ely, both p < 0.001 versus DEX). Thus, treatment with DEX reduces establish
ed eosinophilic airway inflammation and AHR in S. mansoni-sensitized and ai
rway-challenged mice but treatment with TRFK-5 reversed established eosinop
hilia without ameliorating established AHR. Together, these data suggest th
at once airway inflammation develops, neutralizing the effects of IL-5 or r
educing eosinophilia alone may not result in inhibiting established AHR in
atopic asthma.