There are many methods of modeling migrant flows within a set of areal
units, but it is common in most to incorporate some measure of distan
ce as an explanatory variable. These distances are effectively meant t
o represent the typical distance between pairs of areas that would be
traveled by potential migrants. They are usually calculated between po
pulation-weighted centroids derived for each zone. It is argued here t
hat this method of calculating distance is biased and that the zonal s
ystem used will influence the Fnal model parameters that are intended
to describe the underlying migration process. The distances between ne
arby zones will be particularly poorly specified using this approach,
but other problems arise which relate to the shape of the zones and th
e position of the zones in relation to each other. This paper describe
s an alternative method of calculating these distances which reduces t
his bias. It is shown that the resulting models fit the data far more
satisfactorily and that the residuals from models incorporating this a
pproach are significantly different from those identified from models
that use the standard method of specifying distance.