A strategy for detection of viruses in groundwater by PCR

Citation
M. Abbaszadegan et al., A strategy for detection of viruses in groundwater by PCR, APPL ENVIR, 65(2), 1999, pp. 444-449
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Biology,Microbiology
Journal title
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
ISSN journal
00992240 → ACNP
Volume
65
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
444 - 449
Database
ISI
SICI code
0099-2240(199902)65:2<444:ASFDOV>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
We evaluated the use of the PCR for detection of enteric viruses in groundw ater. To do this, we used an improved sample-processing technique and a lar ge-volume amplification protocol. The objective of this study was to use ad vanced molecular techniques to develop a rapid and simple method which can be used by the water industry for detection of viral contamination in a var iety of water samples. The strategy described here fulfills the water indus try's need for a rapid, reliable, easily performed method for analyzing gro undwater for virus contamination. Viruses were detected after concentration from at least 400 gallons (1,512 liters) of water by a filter adsorption a nd elution method, which resulted in a concentrate containing viruses. A to tal of 150 samples were analyzed by performing cell culture assays for ente roviruses and by performing reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) analyses for enteroviruses, hepatitis A virus, and rotavirus. Thirteen samples (8.7%) p roduced cellular cytopathic effects when the Buffalo green monkey cell line was used. When primers specific for enteroviruses were used in RT-PCR, 40 of 133 samples (30.1%) tested positive for the presence of enterovirus RNA. When hepatitis A virus-specific primers were used, 12 of 139 samples (8.6% ) were considered positive for the presence of hepatitis A viral RNA. The R T-PCR analysis performed with rotavirus-specific primers identified 18 of 1 30 samples (13.8%) that were positive for rotavirus RNA sequences. Our samp le-procesing technique and large-volume PCR protocol (reaction volume, 300 mu l) resulted in sufficient removal or dilution of inhibitors so that more than 95% of the samples could be assayed by PCR, Because of its sensitivit y for detecting viral nucleic acid sequences, PCR analysis should produce m ore positive results than cell culture analysis. Since either cell culture analysis or PCR can reveal only a ''snapshot" of the quality of the groundw ater being sampled, PCR seems to be a desirable rapid initial screening too l.