We evaluated the use of the PCR for detection of enteric viruses in groundw
ater. To do this, we used an improved sample-processing technique and a lar
ge-volume amplification protocol. The objective of this study was to use ad
vanced molecular techniques to develop a rapid and simple method which can
be used by the water industry for detection of viral contamination in a var
iety of water samples. The strategy described here fulfills the water indus
try's need for a rapid, reliable, easily performed method for analyzing gro
undwater for virus contamination. Viruses were detected after concentration
from at least 400 gallons (1,512 liters) of water by a filter adsorption a
nd elution method, which resulted in a concentrate containing viruses. A to
tal of 150 samples were analyzed by performing cell culture assays for ente
roviruses and by performing reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) analyses for
enteroviruses, hepatitis A virus, and rotavirus. Thirteen samples (8.7%) p
roduced cellular cytopathic effects when the Buffalo green monkey cell line
was used. When primers specific for enteroviruses were used in RT-PCR, 40
of 133 samples (30.1%) tested positive for the presence of enterovirus RNA.
When hepatitis A virus-specific primers were used, 12 of 139 samples (8.6%
) were considered positive for the presence of hepatitis A viral RNA. The R
T-PCR analysis performed with rotavirus-specific primers identified 18 of 1
30 samples (13.8%) that were positive for rotavirus RNA sequences. Our samp
le-procesing technique and large-volume PCR protocol (reaction volume, 300
mu l) resulted in sufficient removal or dilution of inhibitors so that more
than 95% of the samples could be assayed by PCR, Because of its sensitivit
y for detecting viral nucleic acid sequences, PCR analysis should produce m
ore positive results than cell culture analysis. Since either cell culture
analysis or PCR can reveal only a ''snapshot" of the quality of the groundw
ater being sampled, PCR seems to be a desirable rapid initial screening too
l.