Physical performance: Differences in men and women with and without low back pain

Citation
Dm. Novy et al., Physical performance: Differences in men and women with and without low back pain, ARCH PHYS M, 80(2), 1999, pp. 195-198
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine
Journal title
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
ISSN journal
00039993 → ACNP
Volume
80
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
195 - 198
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-9993(199902)80:2<195:PPDIMA>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
Objective: To determine the extent to which there may be major differences in scores on a battery of physical performance tasks among men with nonspec ific, mechanical low back pain (LBP), women with LBP, healthy men, and heal thy women. Design: Case series survey. Setting: A referral-based orthopedic clinic. Patients: Thirty-three men and 46 women with LBP. Control Subjects: Twenty-one men and 25 women healthy controls. Intervention: Completion of six clinician-assessed physical performance tas ks and self-report inventories. Main Outcome Measure: Performance scores on distance walked in 5 minutes, 5 0-foot walk at fastest speed, repeated sit-to-stand, repeated trunk flexion , loaded forward reach, and the Sorensen fatigue tasks. Results: Discriminant function analysis revealed that the four groups of su bjects performed the physical tasks significantly different in two major wa ys: (I) healthy control subjects outperformed LBP patients, irrespective of gender, on tasks involving trunk control, coordination, and stability whil e withstanding heavy or quickly changing loads on the spine; (2) men outper formed women, irrespective of patient or nonpatient status, on tasks involv ing anthropometric features of limb length. The findings provide guidance o n reasonable performance expectations for men and women patients with LBP. Future studies of treatment effectiveness also will be able to assess physi cal performance change in terms of the intersection between standards set b y the men and women healthy control subjects and those of men and women pat ients. However? whether a return to nonpatient status is an appropriate tre atment goal is left to future research. (C) 1999 by the American Congress o f Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.