Background and Hypothesis: General anesthesia is used for laparoscopic ente
ral access because pneumoperitoneum requires relaxation of the abdominal mu
scles. We wanted to determine whether these procedures could be performed w
ith similar results and cost under local anesthesia.
Design: Randomized controlled study with 30-day follow-up including a cost-
benefit analysis.
Setting: University-affiliated hospitals.
Patients: Forty-eight patients (32 men, 16 women; mean age, 67 years) under
going laparoscopic gastrostomies (n = 32) and jejunostomies (n = 16).
Intervention: Twenty-four patients underwent laparoscopic gastrostomy (n =
15) and jejunostomy (n = 9) under local anesthesia with intravenous conscio
us sedation and monitored anesthesia care. Twenty-four patients had general
anesthesia.
Main Outcome Measures: Conversion to general anesthesia, complications, and
cost.
Results: Ten patients under local anesthesia had periods of deep sedation a
nd 1 required conversion to general anesthesia. One patient under general a
nesthesia required conversion to open gastrostomy. No patients had intraope
rative aspiration; however, 4 aspirated after the procedure. One patient di
ed of myocardial infarction during the 30-day follow-up. We found no signif
icant difference in the total mean cost and actual procedure time. The surg
eon's fee accounted for 31% of the total cost.
Conclusions: Some patients undergoing laparoscopic enteral access may requi
re deep sedation and a rare patient may require general anesthesia. Clinica
l conditions and surgeon preference, therefore, should determine whether lo
cal anesthesia is suitable for laparoscopic gastrostomies and jejunostomies
, and in what setting, since there is no difference in success rate or comp
lications when compared with general anesthesia. Potential savings are poss
ible from the operating room (26% of total cost) or anesthesiologist (12% o
f total cost) if these procedures are performed in an endoscopy suite witho
ut monitored anesthesia care.