Purpose: We set out to determine the rate of response of low-grade (WHO Gra
de II) gliomas to radiotherapy and analyze the relationship between radiogr
aphic response, symptom control and patient survival. Methods: Patients wer
e eligible for this study if they had received radiotherapy for pathologica
lly confirmed, residual, supratentorial low-grade astrocytoma, oligodendrog
lioma, or mixed glioma, and imaging studies (baseline and follow-up) were a
vailable for review. Percent change in tumor size and rate and timing of re
sponse were determined by maximum linear measurement, area measurement, vol
ume measurement using an ellipsoid model, and volume measurement by image s
egmentation. For each method, response to radiotherapy was defined firstly
as a greater than or equal to 50% decrease in tumor size (partial response)
, and secondly as a decrease equivalent to a 50% area decrease (normalized
partial response). Relationships between radiographic response, clinical im
provement and progression-free survival were analyzed using a Cox Proportio
nal Hazard's model. Results: Twenty-one patients in a database (13 male, 8
female; ages 22-66 years) met the eligibility criteria. Twenty were imaged
by computed tomography, 18 had an astrocytoma and 15 were irradiated soon a
fter surgery. Responses were common and not felt to be due to a steroid eff
ect. Use of normalized response criteria improved agreement between assessm
ent of response as determined by the 4 methods. Median time to maximum radi
ographic improvement was 2.8 months (range, 1.5-11). Sixteen patients (76%)
were improved neurologically, the median time to progression was 4.8 years
and the 5-year progression-free survival rate was 43%. We did not detect a
statistically significant association between response (as measured by any
method), symptomatology and progression-free survival. Conclusions: Low-gr
ade gliomas are moderately radioresponsive. Use of volume measurement may o
ver-estimate the number of partial responses unless a volume reduction equi
valent to a 50% area decrease is used to define response. The best way to m
easure response remains uncertain because neither visual, areal nor volume
changes confidently predicted clinical outcomes.