R. Shukla et al., The major, N-2-dG adduct of (+)-anti-B[a]PDE induces G -> A mutations in a5 '-A(G)under-bar-A-3 ' sequence context, CARCINOGENE, 20(2), 1999, pp. 261-268
Previously, in a random mutagenesis study, the (+)-anti diol epoxide of ben
zo[a]pyrene [(+)-anti-B[a]PDE] was shown to induce a complex mutational spe
ctrum in the supF gene of an Escherichia coli plasmid, which included inser
tions, deletions and base substitution mutations, notably a significant fra
ction of GC-->TA, GC-->AT and GC-->CG mutations. At some sites, a single ty
pe of mutation dominated and to understand individual mutagenic pathways th
ese sites were chosen for study by site-specific means to determine whether
the major adduct, [+ta]-B[a]P-N-2-dG, was responsible. [+ta]-B[a]P-N2-dG w
as shown to induce similar to 95% G-->T mutations in a 5'-T (G) under bar C
-3' sequence context and similar to 80% G-->A mutations in a 5'-C (G) under
bar T-3' sequence context. (+)-anti-B[a]PDE induced principally GC-->CG mu
tations in the G133 sequence context (5'-A (G) under bar A-3') in studies u
sing both SOS-uninduced or SOS-induced E.coli. Herein, [+ta]-B[a]P-N2-dG is
shown to induce principally G-->A mutations (>90%) either without or with
SOS induction in a closely related 5'-A (G) under bar A-3' sequence context
(identical over 7 bp), This is the first time that there has been a discre
pancy between the mutagenic specificity of(+)-anti-B[a]PDE versus [+ta]-B[a
]P-N2-dG. Eight explanations for this discordance are considered. Four are
ruled out; e.g. the second most prevalent adduct [ + ca]-B[a]P-N2-dG also i
nduces a preponderance of G-->A mutations (>90%), so it also is not respons
ible for (+)-anti-B[a]PDE-induced G133-->C mutations. The four explanations
not ruled out are discussed and include that another minor adduct might be
responsible and that the 5'-A (G) under bar A-3' sequence context differed
slightly in the studies with [+ta]-B[a]P-N2-dG versus(+)-anti-B[a]PDE, In
spite of the discordance, [Sta]-B[a]P-N-2-dG induces G-->A mutations in the
context studied herein and this result has proven useful in generating a h
ypothesis for what conformations of [+ta]-B[a]P-N-2-dG are responsible for
G-->T versus G-->A mutations.