Agricultural workers, particularly seasonal workers live under precari
ous social conditions indicated by their low level of schooling, small
property, primitive housing, low income, and their deficiencies in so
cial security. Workers interviewed are of the opinion that their situa
tion could be said to be equivalent to that of urban workers but that
they are worse off than family farmers. Conditions of work and incomes
of permanent workers differ from those of seasonal workers. Permanent
staff earn 35 to 50 % more money, moreover they have the benefit of g
uaranteed minimum wages, regular secured job and, thus, continued mont
hly salary. Workers keep this in high esteem. Although relevant litera
ture talks of a high potential of migration among agricultural workers
, the families interviewed seem not yet to be attracted by urban life.
This could be explained by the actual level of payment which is about
the same in both urban and rural areas, a novelty in Chile because so
far urban wages have been higher than rural ones. Main disadvantages
of rural life according to the families interviewed are deficient tran
sport connections and access to health and schooling facilities. Advan
tages are f.e. lower cost of living, less environmental pollution and
a quiet life. Whereas job instability is a problem for the workers, em
ployers gain with it. They are in a better position to balance supply
and demand of labour force if there are no fixed contracts and no mech
anization. Moreover, fluctuating labour force is not in a position to
organize and lacks, thus, the power to fight for better conditions. Ob
viously, government has to take initiatives to improve the situation o
f the so far almost outlawed seasonal workers. Most agricultural worke
rs feel they are appreciated in the rural areas, at lease to the same
degree as small farmers. However, in urban areas they feel uneasy. As
far as their children are concerned agricultural workers do no longer
prefer rural areas for them to live in. Only one quarter of interviewe
es wants children to stay there, most prefer a future in town. In this
regard there still exists a potential for migration. Workers intervie
wed disagreed with government and local administration. Almost three t
hirds have the impression that their business is not cared for. They w
ant government to increase wages, improve housing and schooling facili
ties as well as making jobs more secure. Agricultural workers' expecta
tions exhibit no illusions about their future but rather a most realis
tic view. Consequently, at present no tendencies for migration can be
seen. Things most frequently wanted by agricultural workers are a hous
e of their own, permanent jobs and a piece of land.