H. Nelson et al., Comparative efficacy and safety of albuterol sulfate spiros inhaler and albuterol metered-dose inhaler in asthma, CHEST, 115(2), 1999, pp. 329-335
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Study objective: To compare the long-term efficacy and safety of albuterol
administration using a Spires Inhalation System (Dura Pharmaceuticals; San
Diego, CA) dry powder inhaler (DPI) and albuterol (Ventolin; Glare Wellcome
; Research Triangle Park, NC) administration using a metered-dose inhaler (
MDI) in patients with asthma.
Materials and methods: This was a phase III, 12-week, randomized, double-bl
ind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study of
283 adolescent and adult patients with mild to moderate asthma. The patien
ts were randomized into one of three treatment groups: the Spires group, wh
o were given 108 mu g/actuation of albuterol sulfate equivalent to 90 mu g
of albuterol base; the MDI group, who were given 90 mu g/actuation of albut
erol; and the placebo group.
Results: Over the length of the study, the Spires and MDI groups were compa
rable in all FEV1 parameters. Both active treatment groups were superior to
the placebo group for each FEV1 parameter at all visits. With the exceptio
n of differences at treatment week 0 for the maximum percent change in the
FEV1, the duration of effect, and the area under the curve at baseline, the
re were no statistically significant differences between the Spiros and MDI
groups for any FEV1 parameters, Using a repeated-measures analysis, the FE
V1 parameters at week 0 for the Spires group were not statistically signifi
cantly different from the parameters at weeks 4, 8, and 12. The same analys
is effect at week 0 for the MDI group was greater for maximum percent chang
e in the FEV1 from baseline (weeks 4, 8, and 12) and duration of effect. Ad
verse events and changes in clinical laboratory values, vital signs, ECG re
sults, and physical examinations were reported with similar incidence in ea
ch of the three treatment groups.
Conclusion: Both active treatments were superior to the placebo treatment.
The Spires DPI was well tolerated and was as effective as the albuterol MDI
in treating patients with moderate asthma.