Urinary bone resorption markers in monitoring treatment of symptomatic osteoporosis

We have studied the clinical usefulness of urinary bone resorption markers in postmenopausal women with symptomatic osteoporosis. The study design is a randomised double-blind placebo controlled study, in which the subjects w ere daily treated for 24 months either with a hormone analogue (2.5 mg Livi al(R), generic name Tibolone, Organon, Amsterdam, Holland) plus 800 mg calc ium (n = 14, age 63+/-5 years, range 52-68 years), or with placebo plus 800 mg calcium (n = 19, age 66+/-7 years, range 50-75 years). The laboratory m ethods for urinary bone resorption markers were enzyme immunoassays (EIA) f or urinary pyridoline (PYD) and deoxypyridoline crosslinks (DPD), and for c ross-linked N-telopeptides of Type I Collagen (NTx), and an HPLC assay for urinary hydroxyproline (HOP). All the urine assay results were calculated p er mmol creatinine. All the resorption markers decreased during the two-yea r study period in both groups. The Z scores (discriminating power, i.e. abi lity of the different tests to distinguish the hormone treated subjects fro m the placebo treated subjects) for HOP and PYD were rather low: 0.06-1.52 for HOP and 0.68-1.47 for PYD. The differences between the two treatment gr oups were statistically significant for DPD at 12 and 24 months of treatmen t (P = 0.0471 and P = 0.0466, respectively), the Z scores ranging 0.45-1.90 . NTx showed the most prominent decrease from the beginning of the study es pecially in the hormone treatment group: the differences between the two tr eatment groups were statistically highly significant for NTx already at 6 m onths of treatment (P = 0.0015), and the Z scores remained high ranging 2.1 1-3.82 throughout the two-year study period. Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA ) of the lumbar spine and femoral neck did not show statistically significa nt differences between the two treatment groups throughout the two-year stu dy period. After 2 years there was, however, a significant increase in bone density both in the spine (+ 6.6%, P = 0.0002) and in the femoral neck (3.4%, P = 0.0389) in the women with hormone treatment. Tn the control group a significant increase ( + 5.1%, P = 0.0012) in the spine, whereas a non-s ignificant decrease (-1.5%, n.s.) in the femoral neck was observed. We sugg est that measurement of urinary cross-linked peptides derived from Type I c ollagen (NTx and DPD) might be a useful biochemical method of observing the positive clinical effect (i.e. reduction in hone resorption) following hor mone replacement therapy in postmenopausal fracture patients. (C) 1999 Else vier Science B.V. All rights reserved.