N. Mauras et al., RHIGF-I ADMINISTRATION IN HUMANS - DIFFERENTIAL METABOLIC EFFECTS OF BOLUS VS CONTINUOUS SUBCUTANEOUS DELIVERY, American journal of physiology: endocrinology and metabolism, 35(4), 1997, pp. 628-633
The metabolic effects of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor
I (rhIGF-I) were compared using bolus vs. continuous subcutaneous infu
sions. Subjects (n = 5, 29 +/- 3 yr) received rhIGF-I as subcutaneous
infusions by a Minimed pump (200 mu g . kg(-1) day(-1) over 16 h/day),
and their data were compared with those of subjects (n = 6, 24 +/- 2
yr) who received subcutaneous 200 mu g . kg(-1) day(-1) injections twi
ce a day. L-[1-C-14]leucine and [6,6-H-2(2)]glucose infusion studies a
nd indirect calorimetry were performed, and total and free IGF-I, insu
lin, and glucose concentrations were measured before and after 5-7 day
s of rhIGF-I. Estimates of protein breakdown, oxidation, and synthesis
did not change after pump therapy; in contrast, after bolus doses, pr
otein oxidation decreased (P = 0.001) and whole body protein synthesis
increased (P = 0.04). There was no change in lipid oxidation after pu
mp treatment, whereas the bolus group had lower lipid oxidation (P = 0
.035). Both treatment modalities increased glucose oxidation (P < 0.02
) and glucose production rates (P < 0.03). Overnight fasting insulin c
oncentrations decreased in both groups, whereas plasma glucose remaine
d invariant in the bolus group and decreased modestly in the pump grou
p. Total IGF-I concentrations increased comparably in both groups, but
the increase in free IGF-I was greater in the bolus-treated group (P
= 0.001). We conclude that, in GH-sufficient postabsorptive individual
s, the metabolic effects of rhIGF-I are in part dependent on the mode
of administration, with a robust protein-anabolic effect when rhIGF-I
is given as twice daily bolus injections but no detectable effect on p
rotein turnover after a continuous mode of delivery. There were higher
free IGF-I levels in the bolus-treated subjects, suggesting that this
form of the molecule may be important for mediating IGF-I's protein-a
nabolic effects at the tissue level. The data also suggest that carboh
ydrate metabolism is more responsive than protein metabolism to the co
ntinuous subcutaneous modality of rhIGF-I administration. Even though
the mechanism of these differences in metabolic effects is not entirel
y clear, it should be taken into account when patients are given rhIGF
-I as prolonged treatment.