This paper examines the argument that the availability of collateral rules
out credit rationing. A model of the credit market with ex-ante asymmetric
information and heterogeneous entrepreneurs' attitudes toward risk is set u
p. It is shown that, due to the interplay between project choice and entrep
reneurs' preferences, using collateral as a signal to screen safer projects
may prove impossible. Instead, a partially separating two-contract equilib
rium with rationing at one contract emerges. Contrary to previous theoretic
al research and consistently with conventional wisdom and systematic eviden
ce, the use of collateral is never negatively correlated with project risk.
(C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.