Cm. Lim et al., Respiratory and haemodynamic effects of the prone position at two different levels of PEEP in a canine acute lung injury model, EUR RESP J, 13(1), 1999, pp. 163-168
This study was designed to examine whether the oxygenation response in the
prone position differs in magnitude depending on the level of positive end-
expiratory pressure (PEEP) applied in the supine position, and whether card
iac output (CO) increases in the prone position. Medicine
In seven supine dogs, acute lung injury was established by saline lavage (a
rterial oxygen tension (Pa,O-2)/inspiratory oxygen fraction (FI,O-2) 17.8+/
-9.6 kPa (134+/-72 mmHg)), and inflection point (Pflex) of the respiratory
system was measured (6.6+/-1.4 cmH(2)O), Pa,O-2/FI,O-2 and CO of the supine
and prone positions were obtained under the application of low PEEP and th
en under optimal PEEP (2 cmH(2)O below and above Pflex, respectively).
The net increase in Pa,O-2/FI,O-2 by prone positioning was greater at low P
EEP (27.3+/-12.0 kPa (205+/-90 mmHg)) than at optimal PEEP (4.4+/-13.0 kPa
(33+/-98 mmHg)) (p=0.006), CO decreased significantly with optimal PEEP in
the supine position (2.4+/-0.5 versus 3.1+/-0.4 L . min.(1) at baseline, p<
0.001), and increased to 3.4+/-0.6 and 3.6+/-0.7 L min I in the prone posit
ion at 5 min and 30 min, respectively (both p=0.018), When the dogs were tu
rned supine at optimal PEEP, CO again decreased (2.4+/-0.5 L.min.(1), p<0.0
01),
In conclusion, the prone position augmented the effect of relatively low po
sitive end-expiratory pressure on oxygenation, and attenuated the haemodyna
mic impairment of relatively high positive end-expiratory pressure in a can
ine acute lung injury model.