Some remarkable specimens of the giant Cape Verde skink, Macroscincus coctei (Dumeril & Bibron, 1839), with notes about its distribution and causes of its possible extinction
F. Andreone et E. Gavetti, Some remarkable specimens of the giant Cape Verde skink, Macroscincus coctei (Dumeril & Bibron, 1839), with notes about its distribution and causes of its possible extinction, ITAL J ZOOL, 65(4), 1998, pp. 413-421
At the end of the nineteenth century, about 40 live specimens of the presum
ably now extinct giant Cape Verde skink, Macroscincus coctei, were imported
into Italy by M. G. Peracca. Currently 26 adult specimens (11 males and 15
females) and six eggs, whose provenance is likely Ilheu Branco, have been
located in the herpetological collection of Turin University. Other six spe
cimens exchanged by Peracca are currently present at Treviso ('Seminario Ve
scovile'). This paper provides information about them, together with data o
n some further specimens preserved in two other Italian museums. Ar Genoa t
here are six specimens (four males and two juveniles) from Ilheu Branco and
Ilheu Razor at Florence a single male is preserved and bears, as provenanc
e locality, Sao Vicente. Besides its museological relevance, the Turin and
Treviso series can provide some biometric and meristic information, until n
ow limited to a few specimens. The snout-vent length of the individuals fro
m Turin pooled together with specimens held at Treviso (belonging to the fo
rmer Peracca's collection) is 285.85 +/- 25.12 mm in males and 253.50 +/- 1
7.00 mm in females; sexes differ also in several biometric ratios: males ha
ve in general a larger and longer head and longer hindlegs. The maximum sca
le number at midbody is 114 in both adult sexes and 110 in the smallest juv
enile. Their colouration can be assigned to three colour morphs (grey, yell
ow, and intermediate). II is argued that the 11 males still preserved in Tu
rin may be those measured by Peracca. The presence of the species at Sao Vi
cente is also discussed, but most likely it is due to inaccuracy on the lab
el accompanying the Florence specimen.