Objectives: This article presents a qualitative evaluation of the utility o
f Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) in geriatric care. GAS is an individualized
outcome measure particularly suited for clients with multiple complex prob
lems, such as are commonly served by geriatric programs. Methods: Semistruc
tured interviews were completed with 24 clinicians in four hospital or comm
unity-based geriatric services where GAS has been used. An inductive analys
is was used to identify themes. Results: GAS was described as resulting in
shorter lengths of stay, more focused care, and improved team functioning.
GAS was perceived as having greater use for functional (versus medical) goa
ls, when clinicians had more direct control over treatments, when patients
were involved in goal-setting, and when goals were set by an interdisciplin
ary team. Discussion: GAS has affected both care practices and patient outc
omes. This study illustrates the clinical impacts an outcome measure can ha
ve, as well as the use of qualitative methods for this type of research.