The biaxial flexural strength of Optimal pressable ceramics and TPS Empress
pressable ceramics were tested, compared and the microstructures and compo
sitions explored. The materials evaluated were Optimal shaded (Opcs) and un
shaded (Opcus) ceramics and IFS Empress shaded (Ems) and unshaded (Emus) ce
ramics. Twenty-one disc specimens per material were prepared, heat-treated
and tested. The piston on three-ball test ASTM F394-78 (1991) was used to t
est the specimens in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.
15 mm/min. Specimens were viewed in a scanning electron microscope and X-ra
y diffraction used to determine the phases present. Mean strengths (MPa +/-
SD) were: Ems 120.1 +/- 20.5, Emus 135.8 +/- 16.0, Opcs 139.1 +/- 14.3 and
Opcus 138.0 +/- 11.5. Then was no statistically significant difference bet
ween Optimal shaded, Optimal unshaded and Empress unshaded strength values
(p > 0.05). Empress shaded strength values were significantly lower than th
e other materials tested (p < 0.05). Weibull analysis provided m values: Em
s 6.1, Emus 10.2, Opcs 12.8 and Opcus 13.9 and 1% and 5% probabilities of f
ailure. Secondary electron imaging revealed a dense dispersal of leucite cr
ystals in the glassy matrix of the Optimal ceramics of an average size 5.5
+/- 9.7 mu m(2) for the Optimal shaded ceramic and 6.6 +/- 13.3 mu m(2) for
the Optimal unshaded ceramic. Leucite crystal agglomerates were evident fo
r the Empress shaded material and a uniform distribution of fine leucite cr
ystals (1.9 +/- 1.8 mu m(2)) for the Empress unshaded ceramic. Crystal and
matrix microcracking were present in most of the material microstructures,
together with porosity and tabular alumina platelets in the Optimal ceramic
s. X-ray diffraction revealed the presence of tetragonal leucite and small
amounts of cubic leucite. Optimal ceramics and Empress unshaded ceramic pro
vided higher strength and Weibull in values compared with Empress shaded ce
ramic. Inherent material defects were characterised and cubic leucite was i
dentified. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.