The purpose for this study was to investigate adolescents' judgments about
the appropriate punishment of other adolescents for accused transgressions
in situations where stereotype information was present or absent. Ninety-tw
o male and 85 female predominantly European-American, ninth-grade adolescen
ts made judgments about the appropriateness of punishing members of social
reference groups for accused transgressions about which there was no clear
evidence that the students from the group actually committed the transgress
ions. In two of the four conditions the accused transgressions were consist
ent with group stereotypes whereas in the other two conditions the accused
transgressions were inconsistent with group stereotypes. The majority of ad
olescents judged the act of punishing a group without proper evidence justi
fy those decisions.