Background: The prevalence of gingival overgrowth induced by chronic medica
tion with calcium channel blockers is uncertain. Although there have been s
everal studies examining this question, the results are conflicting, with p
revious estimates ranging from 20% to 83%. There have been only 2 studies e
xamining the prevalence of overgrowth induced by diltiazem and amlodipine,
with estimates of 74% and 3.3%, respectively.
Methods: The current study aimed to address the problems associated with th
ese studies by examining a sample of patients taking one of 3 calcium chann
el blockers, who were drawn from a community-based population in northeaste
rn England. Nine hundred eleven (911) subjects were recruited from general
medical practices in the area. Of these, 442 were taking nifedipine, 181 am
lodipine, and 186 diltiazem. In addition, 102 control subjects were examine
d. Drug and demographic data for each subject were recorded. The periodonta
l condition of all subjects was assessed including plaque index, papillary
bleeding index, and a photograph of the anterior gingivae for subsequent an
alysis of overgrowth severity.
Results: More than six percent (6.3%) of subjects taking nifedipine were se
en to have significant overgrowth. This overgrowth was statistically greate
r than the amount of overgrowth seen in either of the other 2 drug groups o
r the control population. The prevalence of gingival overgrowth induced by
amlodipine or diltiazem was not statistically significant when compared to
the control group. The severity of overgrowth within the nifedipine group w
as found to be related to the amount of gingival inflammation and also to t
he gender of the subject, with males being 3 times as likely to develop ove
rgrowth than females.
Conclusions: The prevalence of clinically significant overgrowth related to
chronic medication with calcium channel blockers is low, i.e., 6.3% for ni
fedipine. Males are 3 times as likely as females to develop clinically sign
ificant overgrowth. The presence of gingival inflammation is an important c
ofactor for the expression of this effect.