Pw. Rundel et al., Structural and physiological adaptation to light environments in neotropical Heliconia (Heliconiaceae), J TROP ECOL, 14, 1998, pp. 789-801
Influence, of habitat on physiological and structural characteristics was i
nvestigated for broad-leaved tropical monocotyledons in the genus Heliconia
(Heliconiaceae). Sever? species were selected from three different light r
egimes, enabling an analysis of the extent to which this genus has adapted
its photosynthetic strategies and morphological characteristics to differen
t daily photon flux densities (PFD). Predictably, light response curves sho
wed a clear gradient with respect to light saturation and rates of maximum
net assimilation (A(max)). Heliconia latispatha, an open site species, show
ed saturation at higher PFD (1400 mu mol m(-2) s(-1)) and higher A(max) (14
-16 mu mol m(-2) s(-1)) than N. mathiasiae, a forest edge species (PFD 1000
mu mol m(-2) s(-1); A(max) 7.5-8.5 mu mol m(-2) s(-1)) and H. irrasa of de
ep-shade forest understorey (PFD 250 mu mol m(-2) s(-1); A(max) 3.5 mol m(-
2) s(-1)). Leaf blade areas were largest in open sites, and leaf specific m
ass was also significantly higher, but leaf support efficiency was highest
in understorey species. Species in open sites had thicker leaves with more
chlorenchyma, whereas deep-shade species had very thin leaves and low stoma
tal densities. These rapidly growing herbaceous perennials appear to alloca
te much of their above-ground biomass to leaf tissues and have a relatively
low investment in support tissues. This contrasts with understorey palms,
in which leaf form and structural investment has been interpreted as a trad
e-off between economy and protection against tissue loss from falling branc
hes. Presence of below-ground rhizomes in Heliconia may provide the key to
this difference.