Purpose: Urodynamic data were evaluated prospectively in symptom-free adult
s.
Materials and Methods: A total of 28 men and 10 women with no history, symp
toms or signs of urological disease and a mean age of 24 years were include
d in the study. Free flow, cystometry and pressure flow studies were perfor
med using standard techniques.
Results: A wide variation was found in all urodynamic parameters. Different
and changing now patterns, low maximum flow rate, large bladder capacity,
bladder overactivity and residual urine, which are all usually considered s
igns of pathological conditions, were seen. Data from free flow and pressur
e flow studies correlated significantly but maximum flow rate was significa
ntly lower, and voiding time and flow time were significantly longer in pre
ssure flow studies.
Conclusions: Technical urodynamics in their actual form are not physiologic
al but they are the best tests available. Since normality in urodynamics ma
y include so many different features the interpretation of technical urodyn
amic investigations should be made with caution.