Comparison of seven RNA extraction methods on stool and shellfish samples prior to hepatitis A virus amplification

Citation
C. Arnal et al., Comparison of seven RNA extraction methods on stool and shellfish samples prior to hepatitis A virus amplification, J VIROL MET, 77(1), 1999, pp. 17-26
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Microbiology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS
ISSN journal
01660934 → ACNP
Volume
77
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
17 - 26
Database
ISI
SICI code
0166-0934(199901)77:1<17:COSREM>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
When choosing an extraction method, two parameters have to be considered: r ecovery of the viral material and elimination or inactivation of inhibitory substances. Seven techniques for extracting hepatitis A virus (HAV) from s tool and shellfish samples were compared, in order to identify the protocol most suited to both types of sample and with the best extraction yield. Th e protocols tested were either techniques for the recovery and purification of total RNA, such as RNAzol, PEG-CETAB, GTC-silica and Chelex, or techniq ues for isolating specifically HAV using a nucleotide probe or a monoclonal antibody. For stool samples, RNAzol, PEG-CETAB, and magnetic beads with an tibody allowed detection of the virus in 11/12 and 12/12 of samples. For sh ellfish samples, three protocols allowed RNA to be extracted in 90% of case s, RNAzol, PEG-CETAB, and GTC-silica. Their rapidity and low cost make RNAz ol and GTC-silica the most suitable for routine diagnostic testing. (C) 199 9 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.