C. Arnal et al., Comparison of seven RNA extraction methods on stool and shellfish samples prior to hepatitis A virus amplification, J VIROL MET, 77(1), 1999, pp. 17-26
When choosing an extraction method, two parameters have to be considered: r
ecovery of the viral material and elimination or inactivation of inhibitory
substances. Seven techniques for extracting hepatitis A virus (HAV) from s
tool and shellfish samples were compared, in order to identify the protocol
most suited to both types of sample and with the best extraction yield. Th
e protocols tested were either techniques for the recovery and purification
of total RNA, such as RNAzol, PEG-CETAB, GTC-silica and Chelex, or techniq
ues for isolating specifically HAV using a nucleotide probe or a monoclonal
antibody. For stool samples, RNAzol, PEG-CETAB, and magnetic beads with an
tibody allowed detection of the virus in 11/12 and 12/12 of samples. For sh
ellfish samples, three protocols allowed RNA to be extracted in 90% of case
s, RNAzol, PEG-CETAB, and GTC-silica. Their rapidity and low cost make RNAz
ol and GTC-silica the most suitable for routine diagnostic testing. (C) 199
9 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.