An evaluation of elongation factor 1 alpha as a phylogenetic marker for eukaryotes

Citation
Aj. Roger et al., An evaluation of elongation factor 1 alpha as a phylogenetic marker for eukaryotes, MOL BIOL EV, 16(2), 1999, pp. 218-233
Citations number
78
Categorie Soggetti
Biology,"Experimental Biology
Journal title
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
ISSN journal
07374038 → ACNP
Volume
16
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
218 - 233
Database
ISI
SICI code
0737-4038(199902)16:2<218:AEOEF1>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
Elongation factor 1 alpha (EF-1 alpha) is a highly conserved ubiquitous pro tein involved in translation that has been suggested to have desirable prop erties fur phylogenetic inference. To examine the utility of EF-1 alpha as a phylogenetic marker for eukaryotes, we studied three properties of EF-1 a lpha trees: congruency with other phyogenetic markers, the impact of specie s sampling, and the degree of substitutional saturation occurring between t axa. Our analyses indicate that the EF-1 alpha tree is congruent with some other molecular phylogenies in identifying both the deepest branches and so me recent relationships in the eukaryotic line of descent. However, the top ology of the intermediate portion of the EF-1 alpha tree, occupied by most of the protist lineages, differs for different phylogenetic methods, and bo otstrap values for branches are low. Most problematic in this region is the failure of all phylogenetic methods to resolve the monophyly of two higher -order protistan taxa, the Ciliophora and the Alveolata. JACKMONO analyses indicated that the impact of species sampling on bootstrap support for most internal nodes of the eukaryotic EF-1 alpha tree is extreme. Furthermore, a comparison of observed versus inferred numbers of substitutions indicates that multiple overlapping substitutions have occurred, especially on the b ranch separating the Eukaryota from the Archaebacteria, suggesting that the rooting of the eukaryotic tree on the diplomonad lineage should be treated with caution. Overall, these results suggest that the phylogenies obtained from EF-1 alpha are congruent with other molecular phylogenies in recoveri ng the monophyly of groups such as the Metazoa, Fungi, Magnoliophyta, and E uglenozoa. However, the interrelationships between these and other protist lineages are not well resolved. This lack of resolution may result from the combined effects of poor taxonomic sampling, relatively few informative po sitions, large numbers of overlapping substitutions that obscure phylogenet ic signal, and lineage-specific rate increases in the EF-1 alpha data set. It is also consistent with the nearly simultaneous diversification of major eukaryotic lineages implied by the "big-bang" hypothesis of eukaryote evol ution.