Modelling the dust and gas outflows from IRC+10 216 - I. Ground-based and airborne observations

Citation
Cj. Skinner et al., Modelling the dust and gas outflows from IRC+10 216 - I. Ground-based and airborne observations, M NOT R AST, 302(2), 1999, pp. 293-304
Citations number
73
Categorie Soggetti
Space Sciences
Journal title
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
ISSN journal
00358711 → ACNP
Volume
302
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
293 - 304
Database
ISI
SICI code
0035-8711(19990111)302:2<293:MTDAGO>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
We have developed a model for the dust and gas envelope of the C star IRC+1 0216. Spherical symmetry is assumed, and the model consistently solves the full radiative transfer problem for the rotationally excited far-infrared a nd submillimetre wavelength CO lines and for the dust continuum. New observ ations of the CO J = 9-8 and 12-11 lines, made with the Kuiper Airborne Obs ervatory, are presented. The model accounts for the first 32 rotational sta tes in the lowest two vibrational levels of CO, and is shown to yield satis factory fits to both line profiles and spatial maps of the CO J = 1-0, 2-1, 3-2, 4-3, 6-5, 7-6, 9-8 and 12-11 lines. The dust model yields a good fit to the spectral energy distribution from the near-IR to millimetre waveleng ths, assuming a distance to the star of 170 pc. From the CO model we are ab le to confirm previous findings that the gas in the outer envelope is heate d by the photoelectric effect, and we also fmd that the mass-loss rate must be of order 5x10(-5) M-. yr(-1), with a gas-to-dust ratio of approximately 220, in order to fit all the CO observations and the spectral energy distr ibution simultaneously, and to predict accurately the observed wind termina l velocity via radiative acceleration of the dust grains which are momentum -coupled to the gas. The gas temperature distribution is found to be lower than predicted by a simple three-level molecule approach which has been fou nd to work for the envelopes of O-rich asymptotic giant branch stars, but i s in good agreement with some previously published models for this source. in contrast with some previously published models, we find no evidence for a recent change in mass-loss rate.