COMPETITIVE CHARGE-REMOTE AND ANION-INDUCED FRAGMENTATIONS OF THE NON-8-ENOATE ANION - A CHARGE-REMOTE REACTION WHICH CO-OCCURS WITH HYDROGEN SCRAMBLING
S. Dua et al., COMPETITIVE CHARGE-REMOTE AND ANION-INDUCED FRAGMENTATIONS OF THE NON-8-ENOATE ANION - A CHARGE-REMOTE REACTION WHICH CO-OCCURS WITH HYDROGEN SCRAMBLING, Perkin transactions. 2, (4), 1997, pp. 695-702
The non-8-enoate anion undergoes losses of the elements of C3H6, C4H8
and C6H12 on collisional activation, The mechanisms of these processes
have been elucidated by a combination of product ion and labelling (H
-2 and C-13) studies, together with a neutralisation reionisation mass
spectrometric study. These studies allow the following conclusions to
be made. (i) The loss of C3H6 involves cyclisation of the enolate ani
on of non-8-enoic acid to yield the cyclopentyl carboxylate anion and
propene. (ii) The loss of 'C4H8' is a charge-remote process (one which
proceeds remote from the charged centre) which yields the pent-4-enoa
te anion, butadiene and dihydrogen. This process co-occurs and compete
s with complex H scrambling. (iii) The major loss of 'C6H12' occurs pr
imarily by a charge-remote process yielding the acrylate anion, hexa-1
,5-diene and dihydrogen, but in this case no H scrambling accompanies
the process. (iv) It is argued that the major reason why the two charg
e-remote processes occur in preference to anion-induced losses of but-
l-ene and hex-l-ene from the respective 4- and 2-anions is that althou
gh these anions are formed, they have alternative and lower energy fra
gmentation pathways than those involving the losses of but-l-ene and h
ex-l-ene; viz. the transient 4-anion undergoes facile proton transfer
to yield a more stable anion, whereas the 2-(enolate) anion undergoes
preferential cyclisation followed by elimination of propene [see (i) a
bove].