Nine patients with symptomatic glenoid loosening were identified and ultima
tely underwent surgical revision. Preoperative assessment demonstrated that
pain, decreased range of motion, and functional disability were common fea
tures. A painful dunking sensation with forward elevation of the arm was no
ted in four of the nine patients. At surgical revision, a grossly loose gle
noid component was found in all cases and removed. Seven of the nine patien
ts underwent revision using another cemented glenoid component, and two pat
ients were left with a hemiarthroplasty due to deficiency. Results followin
g revision surgery demonstrated increased range of motion, decreased pain,
and increased functional ability with good overall patient satisfaction in
seven of nine patients. Two patients in whom revision glenoid components we
re implanted were considered failures due to recurrent loosening. Although
revision of the glenoid component is often technically feasible, recurrent
loosening may occur. Revision to a hemiarthroplasty may be an acceptable al
ternative to glenoid replacement.