Tg. Reichenauer et al., Ozone sensitivity in Triticum durum and T-aestivum with respect to leaf injury, photosynthetic activity and free radical content, PHYSL PLANT, 104(4), 1998, pp. 681-686
Sensitivity to ozone is highly variable in cultivars of different wheat spe
cies, leading to differences in leaf injury and yield. Not much is known ab
out the physiological background of these differences. The objective of thi
s study was to compare the effects of ozone on photosynthetic parameters in
Triticum aestivum L. (spring wheat cv. Nandu, winter wheat cv. Perlo) and
Triticum durum Desf. (cv. Extradur). Plants cultivated in pots were exposed
to 80 nmol mol(-1) ozone, or were used as control plants in a greenhouse.
Stages of growth and senescence of single leaves were recorded. Light-satur
ated net photosynthesis, leaf conductance for water vapour, and chlorophyll
fluorescence were measured. Stomatal limitation was calculated from CO2 re
sponse curves, and the free radical content of whole leaves measured by EPR
spectroscopy.
Senescence of single leaves was enhanced by the ozone-treatment in all thre
e cultivars, in the order Nandu > Perlo > Extradur. Development of whole pl
ants was slightly delayed in Perlo and Nandu, but was accelerated significa
ntly in Extradur. The rate of net photosynthesis under light saturation (A(
sat)) decreased significantly in older, ozone-fumigated leaves of Perlo and
Nandu but not of Extradur. Leaf conductance (g(1)) showed a similar behavi
our, but stomatal limitation (l) was similar between ozone-treated and cont
rol plants. Thus, an ozone-induced closure of stomata was not the reason fo
r the observed difference in A(sat). Perlo and Nandu showed a significant,
only partly reversible decrease in F-v/F-m in ozone-fumigated leaves, where
as in Extradur the decrease was fully reversible only in older leaves. Whol
e leaves of Extradur, in contrast to Perlo and Nandu, showed no increase in
EPR free radical signals. The higher ozone tolerance of Extradur was thus
not caused by decreased ozone uptake via the stomata, but by a better abili
ty of photosynthetically active mesophyll cells to cope with photooxidative
stress.