Ma. Anderson et al., Results of a survey of small-animal practitioners on the perceived clinical efficacy and safety of an oral nutraceutical, PREV VET M, 38(1), 1999, pp. 65-73
A mail survey of 3080 practitioners from two sampling frames was used to de
termine the perceived clinical efficacy and safety of an oral nutraceutical
for the treatment of degenerative joint disease (DJD) in small animals. Ov
erall response rate was 82%, of which 64% reported that they were recommend
ing the oral nutraceutical to their clients. There was a high variability r
eported between the severity of DJD and response to treatment. Sixty-eight
percent of practitioners reported lame dogs older than five years to be the
most responsive to treatment. Most practitioners (83%) believed response t
o treatment with the studied product occurred within four weeks. Practition
ers using the product rated the clinical efficacy of the product to be eith
er 'good' or 'excellent' in improving mobility, alleviating pain and improv
ing attitude in the majority of the treated animals. No practitioner report
ed a worsening of pain, mobility or attitude. Self-reported adverse effects
were 2% (the most common was gastrointestinal upset). The results of this
survey indicated that perceived clinical efficacy of the studied nutraceuti
cal in the treatment of DJD was regarded to be 'good' or 'excellent' by mos
t of the practitioners who use this product and was considered to be safe w
ith minimal side effects. This provides additional information on the produ
ct for use in planning future clinical trials. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.
V. All rights reserved.