Se. Burke et al., Profile of recombinant pro-urokinase given by intraarterial versus intravenous routes of administration in a canine thrombosis model, THROMB HAEM, 81(2), 1999, pp. 301-305
Catheter-directed thrombolysis has gained increasing acceptance for the tre
atment of patients who present with vascular occlusion; however, intravenou
s injection may be preferable in selected patients. Recombinant prourokinas
e (r-proUK) is a recently-developed fibrin-selective thrombolytic agent wit
h specificity for clot-bound plasminogen. To compare the effects of r-proUK
on clot lysis and restoration of blood flow when injected by either intraa
rterial or intravenous routes of administration, we utilized a dog model of
arterial thrombosis in which a radiolabelled clot is formed in the femoral
artery. The r-proUK was given by intravenous infusion to one group of 18 a
nimals in doses ranging from 10,000 IU/kg to 100,000 IU/kg; a second group
of 27 dogs was treated with r-proUK administered by the intra-arterial rout
e in a dose range from 300 IU to 10,000 IU. Clot lysis was measured by moni
toring the loss of counts from the radiolabelled clot over time; blood flow
was also monitored throughout the experimental period. Animals which recei
ved intravenous treatment showed dose-related clot lysis ranging from 14% t
o 70% at 2 h, while those which received intra-arterial infusions showed ly
sis ranging from 22% to 79% over the same period. For similar degrees of cl
ot lysis attained at the highest dose levels of 100,000 IU/kg and 10,000 IU
, blood flow was restored to 77% and 35% of control levels in dogs which re
ceived intravenous and intraarterial treatment, respectively. The hemostati
c protein fibrinogen was not reduced in any of the treatment groups. The re
sults indicate that 100 rimes more intravenous than intra-arterial r-proUK
is required to produce similar clot lysis in this canine model, and that th
e agent can be administered at this level without induction of a systemic l
ytic state.