The humanization of monoclonal antibodies has generated a class of therapeu
tic products with improved safety, longer half-lives, and greatly diminishe
d immunogenicity. These engineered proteins are highly species specific and
in many cases only cross-react in humans. Where there is cross-reactivity
in nonhuman primates or other species, it is not always clear that the phar
macologic effects reflect the potential actions in human volunteers or pati
ents. As with other biologic products, the profile of humanized monoclonal
antibodies dictates the preclinical strategy. The preclinical programs for
the 2 humanized monoclonal antibodies described here, anti-HLA-DR (Hu1D10)
and anti-CD3 (HuM291), demonstrate several unique aspects that affected the
ir preclinical development strategy. Hu1D10 binds to a posttranslational fo
rm of HLA-DR and recognizes this antigen in some but not all human and nonh
uman primates. The second antibody, HuM291, cross-reacts with CD3 only in t
he chimpanzee, which is not an optimal test species. In addition, a markete
d anti-CDS product exists (OKT3(R)), and in the preclinical development of
our antibody during testing of efficacy and safety, we needed to focus on a
dverse effects that might be similar to those of OKT3(R). In these studies,
the safety, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and pharmacology (B- and T-c
ell depletion and recovery) of the 2 antibodies were evaluated. The focus i
n this review is on the safety and pharmacology testing and the current sta
tus of each drug.