Pharmacology and safety assessment of humanized monoclonal antibodies for therapeutic use

Citation
C. Klingbeil et Dh. Hsu, Pharmacology and safety assessment of humanized monoclonal antibodies for therapeutic use, TOX PATHOL, 27(1), 1999, pp. 1-3
Citations number
6
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Toxicology
Journal title
TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY
ISSN journal
01926233 → ACNP
Volume
27
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1 - 3
Database
ISI
SICI code
0192-6233(199901/02)27:1<1:PASAOH>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
The humanization of monoclonal antibodies has generated a class of therapeu tic products with improved safety, longer half-lives, and greatly diminishe d immunogenicity. These engineered proteins are highly species specific and in many cases only cross-react in humans. Where there is cross-reactivity in nonhuman primates or other species, it is not always clear that the phar macologic effects reflect the potential actions in human volunteers or pati ents. As with other biologic products, the profile of humanized monoclonal antibodies dictates the preclinical strategy. The preclinical programs for the 2 humanized monoclonal antibodies described here, anti-HLA-DR (Hu1D10) and anti-CD3 (HuM291), demonstrate several unique aspects that affected the ir preclinical development strategy. Hu1D10 binds to a posttranslational fo rm of HLA-DR and recognizes this antigen in some but not all human and nonh uman primates. The second antibody, HuM291, cross-reacts with CD3 only in t he chimpanzee, which is not an optimal test species. In addition, a markete d anti-CDS product exists (OKT3(R)), and in the preclinical development of our antibody during testing of efficacy and safety, we needed to focus on a dverse effects that might be similar to those of OKT3(R). In these studies, the safety, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and pharmacology (B- and T-c ell depletion and recovery) of the 2 antibodies were evaluated. The focus i n this review is on the safety and pharmacology testing and the current sta tus of each drug.