We have used spring powered jet injectors to deliver a solution of a naked
DNA vaccine encoding the influenza hemagglutinin HA into the skin of mice a
nd monkeys. We compared the immune responses induced by this needleless inj
ection technique into the skin to the responses induced by a classical i.m.
immunization. Both routes of immunization induced significant ELISA antibo
dy titers and hemagglutination inhibition (Hf) titers that were above the u
sual threshold values predictive of protection against influenza in mice an
d monkeys. In mice, both ways of immunization were equally efficient in ind
ucing IIA-specific CTL responses. Regarding antibody isotypes. the IgG1/IgG
2a ratio was in favour of the IgG2a isotype for i.m. immunization and more
balanced for i.d, immunization. The ability of the two injection techniques
to induce immunity in mice did not correlate with transgene expression in
the site of administration. In fact, local gene expression was 10-100 fold
more important in the injected muscle as compared to the jet-injected skin
when assessed by using the luciferase reporter system. (C) 1999 Elsevier Sc
ience Ltd. All rights reserved.