What is the quality of life for survivors of cardiac arrest? A prospectivestudy

Citation
G. Nichol et al., What is the quality of life for survivors of cardiac arrest? A prospectivestudy, ACAD EM MED, 6(2), 1999, pp. 95-102
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE
ISSN journal
10696563 → ACNP
Volume
6
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
95 - 102
Database
ISI
SICI code
1069-6563(199902)6:2<95:WITQOL>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the quality of life of survivors of in-hospital and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, and to correlate quality of life with clini cally important parameters. Methods: Cohort followed at least six months af ter hospital discharge. Eligible patients had survived to hospital discharg e after sudden cardiac arrest in 1) EDs, wards, and intensive care units of five university hospitals and 2) all locations outside hospitals in two mi dsized cities. Of 126 patients discharged alive, 30 died before they could be interviewed. Of the 96 patients remaining, 86 (90% of available patients , 68% of survivors to discharge) completed the interview. Quality of life w as assessed with the Health Utilities Index Mark 3, which describes health as a utility score on a scale from perfect health (equal to 1.0) to death ( equal to 0.) Results: Mean age (+/-SD) of interviewed survivors was 65 +/- 14 years, and 47 (55%) were male; mean time between collapse and initiation of CPR was 2.2 +/- 2.6 minutes. Mean utility was 0.72 (+/-0.22). Utilities were significantly higher among patients who had a shorter duration of res uscitation (mean = 0.81 for those who received less than 2 minutes of CPR, 0.76 for those who received 3 to 10 minutes, and 0.65 for others, p = 0.05, r(2) = 0.07). Mean utilities of survivors were worse than those of the gen eral population (mean = 0.85 +/- 0.16, p < 0.01) and those whose activities were not limited by chronic disease (mean = 0.91 +/- 0.08, p < 0.01). Conc lusions: Although overall survival was poor, most survivors had acceptable health-related quality of life. Therefore, concerns about poor quality of l ife are not a valid reason to abandon efforts to improve the health care sy stem's response to victims of sudden cardiac arrest. Further research is ne cessary to identify effective strategies for improving both survival and qu ality of life after cardiac arrest.