Performance of emergency lifesaving procedures is an integral part of emerg
ency medicine resident training. Objective: To assess attitudes of ED patie
nts regarding the practice of procedures on the newly deceased. Methods: A
descriptive survey was administered to a convenience sample of ED patients
and their families at two urban military Level-1 trauma centers. Subjects w
ere asked about their overall opinions regarding the practice of nontherape
utic procedural skills on themselves or relatives immediately after death i
n the ED. Subgroup analysis included the issue of advanced permission and o
pinions regarding procedures defined by the investigators as noninvasive (e
.g., laryngeal mask airway) or invasive (e.g., cricothyrotomy). Data were a
nalyzed descriptively and with chi-square as appropriate. For comparison of
proportions, a sample size of at least 140 was chosen for an alpha of 0.05
and a beta of 0.10 to detect an effect size of 0.3. Alpha was corrected fo
r multiple comparisons prior to the study. Results: Three hundred seventeen
surveys were collected and 88% (n = 280) were complete. Seventy-five perce
nt (n = 290) and 70% (n = 273) of the respondents agreed to after-death pro
cedures on themselves or their relatives, respectively. However, only 40% (
n = 106) and 50% (n = 131) would allow such procedures without prior permis
sion. Seventy-one percent (n = 189) were willing to give permission in a li
ving will, while 85% (n = 238) indicated support of a wallet card format. T
here was no significant difference in permission rates when contrasting ind
ividual noninvasive and invasive procedures. Conclusion: Most patients are
willing to have procedures performed on themselves or relatives shortly aft
er death, yet the majority request that permission be obtained in advance.
A living will or carried card would be acceptable for such permission.