Patient and family attitudes regarding the practice of procedures on the newly deceased

Citation
Ca. Manifold et al., Patient and family attitudes regarding the practice of procedures on the newly deceased, ACAD EM MED, 6(2), 1999, pp. 110-115
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE
ISSN journal
10696563 → ACNP
Volume
6
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
110 - 115
Database
ISI
SICI code
1069-6563(199902)6:2<110:PAFART>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
Performance of emergency lifesaving procedures is an integral part of emerg ency medicine resident training. Objective: To assess attitudes of ED patie nts regarding the practice of procedures on the newly deceased. Methods: A descriptive survey was administered to a convenience sample of ED patients and their families at two urban military Level-1 trauma centers. Subjects w ere asked about their overall opinions regarding the practice of nontherape utic procedural skills on themselves or relatives immediately after death i n the ED. Subgroup analysis included the issue of advanced permission and o pinions regarding procedures defined by the investigators as noninvasive (e .g., laryngeal mask airway) or invasive (e.g., cricothyrotomy). Data were a nalyzed descriptively and with chi-square as appropriate. For comparison of proportions, a sample size of at least 140 was chosen for an alpha of 0.05 and a beta of 0.10 to detect an effect size of 0.3. Alpha was corrected fo r multiple comparisons prior to the study. Results: Three hundred seventeen surveys were collected and 88% (n = 280) were complete. Seventy-five perce nt (n = 290) and 70% (n = 273) of the respondents agreed to after-death pro cedures on themselves or their relatives, respectively. However, only 40% ( n = 106) and 50% (n = 131) would allow such procedures without prior permis sion. Seventy-one percent (n = 189) were willing to give permission in a li ving will, while 85% (n = 238) indicated support of a wallet card format. T here was no significant difference in permission rates when contrasting ind ividual noninvasive and invasive procedures. Conclusion: Most patients are willing to have procedures performed on themselves or relatives shortly aft er death, yet the majority request that permission be obtained in advance. A living will or carried card would be acceptable for such permission.