Cp. Friedman et al., Contemporary issues in medicine - Medical informatics and population health: Report II of the Medical School Objectives Project, ACAD MED, 74(2), 1999, pp. 130-141
The Association of American Medical Colleges established the Medical School
Objectives Project (MSOP) to set forth program-level learning objectives t
hat medical school deans and faculties can use as guides in reviewing their
medical student education programs (initial phase), and to suggest strateg
ies that they might employ in implementing agreed-upon changes in those pro
grams (implementation phase). The publication of MSOP Report I in 1998 conc
luded the initial phase of the project by presenting 30 program-level learn
ing objectives that represent a consensus within the medical education comm
unity on the knowledge, skills, and attitudes that students should possess
before graduation from medical school. Report II, published here, is the wo
rk of two expert panels that focus on the two interrelated topics of medica
l informatics and population health for which Report I developed learning o
bjectives.
The Medical Informatics Panel identified five roles played by physicians-li
felong learner, clinician, educator-communicator, researcher, and manager-i
n which medical informatics plays a vital part, and defined one or more inf
ormatics learning objectives important for each role (e.g., the successful
medical school graduate, in his or her role as a clinician, should be able
to retrieve patient-specific information from a clinical information system
). The panel then identified ways that schools might implement educational
programs to address the various informatics learning objectives and to even
tually embed informatics experiences throughout the curriculum rather than
relying on an informatics course to achieve some or all of the objectives.
The Population Health Perspective Panel developed a consensus definition of
"population health perspective" (PHP); chose four types of populations to
discuss (e.g., the geographic community); reviewed pressures for and agains
t the implementation of a PHS in the curriculum (e.g., the cross-disciplina
ry nature of the topic is a barrier); named the fields that encompass train
ing in a PHP (e.g., public health); listed several educational objectives,
three principles to govern the design of educational activities, and a numb
er of recommendations; and closed with a list of the knowledge, skills, and
attitudes that should be instilled by a successful PHF curriculum.